Although the “Ung Ing” government is considered to have had power to govern the country for only 2 weeks, counting from September 13 after the policy statement to the parliament was completed, as the “singer” “Natthaporn Toprayoon” who set a deadline that the “Ing government” would not last 3 months, filed a complaint that the cabinet’s policy statement violated Section 162 of the Constitution because it did not state completely where the income would be used for expenses, not including the conditions of the Prime Minister’s performance of duties before the policy statement ended.
..
Although the “Ung Ing” government is considered to have had power to govern the country for only 2 weeks, counting from September 13 after the policy statement to the parliament was completed, as the “singer” “Natthaporn Toprayoon” who set a deadline that the “Ing government” would not last 3 months, filed a complaint that the cabinet’s policy statement violated Section 162 of the Constitution because it did not state completely where the income would be used for expenses, not including the conditions of the Prime Minister’s performance of duties before the policy statement ended.
By asking the Constitutional Court to revoke all 35 cabinet members from their positions, but it is seen as if they have been in office for a long time because they “took over” from “Settha” who was “taken over by the “Constitutional Court” (August 14) due to the “unethical” issue of appointing “the lawyer of the candy bag” as a minister. Therefore, it is not strange that the “Ing government” entering the country amidst the “ethical trap” will rush to “spin” in the “populist” style by changing digital money into cash to please the people to the fullest, starting with “immediate distribution” to the “vulnerable groups”, the disabled group, tomorrow (September 25), not including the attempt to spin the “400 baht minimum wage” policy, but it was interrupted and could not be distributed in time for October 1 because the “employers” side did not join the tripartite, similar to the “political wing” of the Pheu Thai government, which has turned to quickly amend the constitution in “some sections” on the issue of “ethics” and the framework of the power of independent organizations, especially the “Constitutional Court”, from the original attempt to “delay” until the end of the government’s term. It is seen as coming from a “hallucination” in the case of “Settha” who was hit with the “ethics” issue, which led to Pheu Thai pushing for a faster constitutional amendment, in some respects with the opposition “Children-People Party”, by having a meeting of the coalition parties for discussion on October 1st. At first, it seemed like the “politicians” of the coalition parties seemed to agree, like the attitude of “Sia Nu” last week, until today, they were “disgusted” with the amendment of the “ethics” issue being “flammable” that would have an impact, as “Sia Nu” confirmed today that the Bhumjaithai Party does not support amending the ethical standards section of the constitution, and that “Prime Minister Ing” also said that if he did it well, what would he be afraid of? He confirmed that the statement by “Mr. Paradorn”, the deputy speaker of the House of Representatives of Bhumjaithai, was considered a statement by the party. Previously, “Paradorn” spoke about the ethics issue of amending the constitution, saying that politicians cannot think on behalf of the people. The speakers must be the people, must think carefully, must amend for the benefit of the people, and those with vested interests spoke. Society does not listen to this issue. Talking to fellow MPs, they said it is dangerous and sensitive. It should be a referendum on the whole constitution, except for Chapter 1 and Chapter 2, and setting up a Constituent Assembly to amend the people’s constitution. It is better than amending only the 2 issues. That’s why the Bhumjaithai Party did not propose a draft of the constitution amendment. It can be said that not only “Bhumjaithai” but also “Chartthaipattana” has a similar stance to Pheu Thai’s amendment of each section, which seems to be for the benefit of the political party. As “Worachai Hemma”, former red-shirt leader and advisor to Deputy Prime Minister Bhumtham, still insists that it is necessary to amend the constitution on the ethics issue, which is too broad, including the authority of independent organizations, which has judges coming in to judge politicians, which affects the administration of the “Ing government” that must be stuck in these frameworks. He gave an example of the case of “Settha” who was administering the country and was suddenly taken down by the “Constitutional Court” on the issue of “ethics”. However, it is interesting to see a warning from a former leader of the PAD mob, “Suriyasai Katasila”, who posted on FB yesterday, saying, “Be careful of amending the constitution, breaking the social trend!” It takes time to build consensus, stating that the proposal of amendments to the constitution by articles by Pheu Thai and the Prachachon Party on the ethical framework, the issue of independent organization power, the issue of party dissolution, and other issues, although it is the right of political parties and MPs to proceed, but if considering legitimacy, the legitimacy is still low because do not forget that the issues proposed for amendment are highly sensitive issues. Even if there is consensus in the parliament, if there is no approval from outside the parliament or from the people, it will only cause unnecessary conflict and division. The government has only been in office for less than a month and has many problems to solve. There are no tangible results yet. It should accelerate the creation of confidence and trust from the people more than this. Then there will be a chance. Pheu Thai should absorb the lessons of at least two events: the sale of Shin Corporation shares and avoiding the parliamentary debate in 2006 and the enactment of the final amnesty law in 2013, which are also lessons for the majority who lack favorability. Follow more good content like this on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/innnews.co.th
Twitter : https://twitter.com/innnews
Youtube : https://www.youtube.com/c/INNNEWS_INN
TikTok : https://www.tiktok.com/@inn_news
LINE Official Account : @innnews