It has become a comparative “intersecting point” at this time with two issues where the “Ink government” has been questioned about its management in terms of weighting and importance.
..
It has become a comparative “intersecting point” at this time with two issues where the “Ink government” has been questioned about its management in terms of weighting and importance. whether to adhere to providing justice to “the people” first or not Will adhere to providing justice to the people on their side, whether it be 1. Proposals from many sides for the government to issue an Emergency Decree (Decree) to stop the statute of limitations in the Tak Bai 85 corpses case, which is about to expire. On October 25, 2024, until “P’Uan-Phumtham” had to come out and explain that The legal department is currently studying it.
While “Prime Minister Ink-Pae Thongthan” goes out in style “Ching Chi” refused to express his opinion by speaking briefly. to the reporter, “Let me go first,” or it will be 2. The report of the Special Committee to consider and study the guidelines for enacting the Amnesty Act. There was a resolution at the meeting of the House of Representatives this afternoon (Oct. 24) that appeared both in agreement and in opposition, regarding the issue of the “Tak Bai case” that will expire tomorrow. In addition to the demand for Pheu Thai Government of “Prime Ink” as The “Prime Minister” has made an excuse to be the one who fixed things. The “Prime Minister” did it during the “Extinguish the Southern Fire” era of 2004 by issuing a decree to stop time. expiration of legal case in order to lead to those “Related Persons” starting from Former Commander of the 4th Army Region “Gen. Pisan” came down. who has just now resigned from the MP and Pheu Thai member who fled On one side there is also a pendant. The “Prime Minister” issued an apology to the people. “Khunying Sudarat” Head of Thai Sang Thai Set up a statement urging the Prime Minister to show responsibility by apologizing to the people. and show sincerity in removing the spark of conflict in the South by Tracking down defendants who have fled the case into the justice system, in the case of “Thepthai Senphong”, a former Nakhon Si Thammarat MP who posted on FB in addition to not agreeing with the issuance of the Tak Bai statute of limitations. Because it solves the problem at the end of the cause and also questions the maturity and vision of “Prime Minister Ink” continues to solve problems in the 3 southern border provinces That was clear when the reporter asked about the 85 Tak Bai corpses that were about to expire. Does it have an impact on the Pheu Thai Party and the government? Didn’t get any answer from “Prime Minister Ing” who kept his mouth shut. Walked away and got into the car. As for the other issue, in the case of the draft amnesty bill That is linked to Section 112, there are signs of not only opposition but action to take the lead. Conservative political parties like the Palang Pracharath Party “Paiboon” came out and said “Uncle Pom” ordered MPs to vote against the report. Amnesty committee that appears The majority of the committee members agreed with granting an amnesty for offenders of the Criminal Code, Section 112. It was seen that imposing an amnesty for offenders under Section 112 would make the offenses committed under Section 112 no longer an offense. Therefore, the enactment of the amnesty law. 112 therefore has a severe impact on the protection of the institution, while Ajahn Chusak Sirinil, Minister from Pheu Thai, said that ‘Pheu Thai Party’ approves this report and considers it the privilege of the coalition party. How will they vote? Because this report is not a consideration of the law, it is not a consideration of whether or not there will be Section 112. This report is only the result of a study of what must be done if there is an amnesty law. which I have tried to explain many times and “Mr. Noppadol Pattama”, Pheu Thai Party list MP He clearly stated that he did not agree with the amnesty of Section 112 and from listening to the meetings there was a trend in that direction. Therefore, he emphasized that the meeting did not agree with the amnesty of Section 112. 112 Just now is not a consideration of the law. It’s just a legal education agenda, like “Pakornwut” from the People’s Party. It is said that the party has also agreed to extinguish the amnesty report, still believing that it will join hands with “Pheu Thai” through the education draft. Confirming that this report is not a law enactment but is only a study for the enactment of a law and is not an amendment to Section 112 of the Criminal Code. However, this motion is a motion that the Pheu Thai Party proposed and asked the House to set up. To find a solution together on various matters. If at the meeting there is a resolution of disapproval, it will be a pity. Because of the establishment of this extraordinary committee to find a solution that everyone can accept. However, if the said draft is approved Now we have a body. Amnesty Act at Mr. Chaithawat Tulathon, former leader of the Kao Klai Party He was already the one who proposed it.
followGood contentYou can find this at
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/innnews.co.th
Twitter : https://twitter.com/innnews
Youtube : https://www.youtube.com/c/INNNEWS_INN
TikTok : https://www.tiktok.com/@inn_news
LINE Official Account : @innnews